Category Archives: Uncategorized

Brave

sketches of Princess Merida in "Brave"

Before my daughter Merida’s accident, I might have (hyperbolically) called what happened today my worst nightmare:  Shopping at Target, I asked her which underwear she wanted to choose.  While I suggested Hello Kitty or Paul Frank monkeys, she grabbed the Disney Princesses.  I suggested several other options (“Look honey, these have the days of the week!”) but she was certain of what she wanted.  I bought them.

All her life, my husband and I have worked to keep her away from TV and mainstream junk.  I know, everyone says the Pixar movies are great, and I have seen a couple of them (not bad) but Merida thinks movies are the things we watch on youtube, most often short videos of the band Hot Club of Cowtown, or Mark Bittman cooking.

But next year, Disney/Pixar will release a film called “Brave“.  The heroine is named Princess Merida.  Princess Merida!  When I first found out about this last spring, I was horrified.  How dare they steal my child’s name?!  And how badly will they mispronounce it, adding to the confusion we already face each visit to the pediatrician’s office, when she’s called “Muhr-Ida” and other versions that are not her name.

Then came the accident.  Through the entire process, and still, my Merida has been unbelievably brave and strong.  A little warrior, future slayer.  (I’ve always wanted to raise a slayer, but that’s another story.)  Swirled in now with all the ambivalence I have about Disney and skewed, commercial images of what girls and women should be, I am now, strangely, okay with the naming of next summer’s princess.  I’ll take it!  If it gives my daughter a little pop culture validation that she is awesome and strong and amazing, who am I to argue?  I told Merida and a friend of hers about the movie, and was quickly convinced to take them both to the theatre next summer.  (It’s a date!  Robbie Coltrane does one of the voices, so it can’t be all bad.)

But next time she’s getting  the monkey underwear.

Cornflowers and ghosts

A mess that might be grow up to be a story someday.

This morning, as I did my post-child infrequent and highly interrupted version of Julia Cameron’s morning pages (more like three quarters of a page, if I’m lucky) my daughter said, “My, look at all those words!  It’s like a giant nametag!”  Aside from making me laugh, her comment reminded me of the photo I took last weekend: the mess I was making with a ghost story in progress, whose birth story can be found here.  When I talk about making a mess, this is what I mean.  This is the kind of mess that I love.  It’s all my mess (no one else has read this story, and all the scribbles, highlighting, and editing is mine!  No judgement, no other voices in my head!) and here I’m trying to make order of it.  It’s the first draft of a messy story that came from a terrible essay about one thing which grew into an essay about something else.  Like the leggy cornflowers that we let go (“Let?”  Who has time to even consider “letting” weeds grow; they just grow taller when I’m not looking) that bloom into flowers, whose color is unmatched in the rest of nature.  The flower that needed to be.

I’m not saying this mess is good, and I don’t know if it ever will be.  But what else would I rather be doing?  Maybe weeding the other flowers to give the cornflower more room.

What about you?  What would you weed today?  What would you plant?

Three winter songs

These people know how to deal with winter...

The other day when the sun didn’t shine, and didn’t shine, and didn’t shine, and all my clothes that are not in the attic weren’t warm enough, I got jittery, wondering how I would make it through winter this year.  People say as you age, cold weather becomes harder to endure.  But the grey is too soon this year.  The rain.  Drear, she came early this year.

So as I do when I prepare for winter, today I listened to Dead Can Dance’s Toward the Within.  The live album includes perhaps the saddest song ever, Lisa Girard’s transcendent “Sanvean.”  You can see a long, beautiful version here.  (Her gown is worth a look, too!)  Lisa Girard just breaks my heart, and then fills up the broken pieces.  This week of grey skies needed true keening like hers.  It’s been a hard year.

Another cathartic winter song on the same album is the traditional, “I Am Stretched at Your Grave,” sung here by Brendan Perry.  (For a version with a funky backbeat that you might have heard, try this one.)

And now for something completely different.  This might be obvious to you raindogs, but “November” by Tom Waits is a worthy winter anthem.  Who else but himself could sing, “Go away, you rainsnout, go away, blow your brains out…”

Here’s hoping the sun shines soon.  But if not, you know what I will be listening to.

What will get you through the chill this year?

Pretending can be just as good

Mukilteo, Washington

Driving back to Seattle from the Mukilteo ferry last week, my daughter said the trees and houses were in the way of her seeing the water and mountains. “The sky pretends to be water and the clouds pretend to be snow-covereds,” she said.

Grieving the loss of the linear narrative

Because I am or have been:

1) A rule follower, and

2) Timid, and always, still learning how to write,

I have tended to write stories that are mostly linear.  I might mess with the order of things but there is usually only one layer of story happening.  As a writer, more than that confuses me.  Until recently.

Last spring, I set out to write an essay about stuff, the physcial stuff that fills my house.  I forced all these ideas (William Morris!  Feng shui!  The long-kept dead canary in a close relative’s freezer!) into the salad bowl of words until it was a big mess (kinda like my closet).  But instead, what emerged was that I actually needed to write an essay about my childhood house that burned down, and, alongside it, growing naturally from that fire, a ghost story (two ghost stories, as it turned out, because I thought the narrator was the ghost, but it was actually the boy whose father was the fire chief orchestrating the planned burning of the house.  I’ll save the ghost POV for a parallel story, I think.)  These last three layers (of fire) all turned out to be strata of the burning house “story” which is inspired by my own experiences.  As the mess emerged (“wretched from my spirit” as I once described some of my friend Mark Horiuchi‘s ceramic art, which was “wretched from his spirit”) I realized I wanted to mess with my automatic stance of linear narrative.  For the essay about the burned down house where I used to live, I set out to build layers, to mimic the memories as they occurred to me.  Really, I was attempting a weak tea imitation of Joan Didion’s glorious memoir, The Year of Magical Thinking.  My essay is still an unfinished mess.

There is something in me that until very recently has always believed stories actually are (or worse, somehow should be) linear.  Believed that, trick around with things as writers might, the human being who reads actually needs, on some biological level, a pattern that makes sense.  But I’m starting to see more deeply into the crusts, the layers, how much there is (or can be, some day, if we work hard enough at simultaneous clarity and opacity) under the patina of the linear.

Like layers of paint, the story starts to peel away, revealing hidden stories and complexities and differing perceptions.

Like multiple transparencies (remember those, before PowerPoint?) in slightly different languages I try to make something that’s more complicated (on purpose! Take that, William Strunk!) but that still has some sort of shape, so it’s not chaos exactly, but a sort of artifice, imitating the mess that is realness while also, by the end of the thing, amounting to something, making some sort of sense or logic or scaffolding, a pattern, no matter how faint or possibly only visible to the eye of the writer.  (I did say “try.”)

(What was I saying?)

I still want things to make sense.  Maybe it’s my primal need.  Writing a story that’s relatively linear, like arranging and organizing things in my home, gives me a false sense of control, as if I can shape the unshapable.  The problem, maybe, is that no matter how we play, words can only roll out one letter at a time, it’s how they are made, so there’s no avoiding the linear, and facts and feelings tend not to adhere to my yearning for order, tend to sprawl out like oversized legs in the aisle of a plane, tend to bump against the cart that delivers (via lovely manicured hands) peanuts and near-dry, immasculated slices of lime in tonic.

I don’t want to open a book and have the letters fall off the page, I just don’t.

But then you realize there is a large-ish ball of magenta fuzz on the seat back in front of you and although you have been staring at it, off and on, for two hours, you will never know the air-traveler who left it there for you to stare at while your plane bumps in the air, what is this metal machine bumping against, exactly? for it must be something there, or how can air have such an impact?  Somehow, we have to live in all this not-knowing, not ever being able to know whose fuzz we are staring at without even realizing it.

The end of a story?

It’s weird writing something when you don’t know you’re about to write the end of the thing.  This might be the end of the ghost story I’m writing.  We’ll see.  But it seems like the end.

This photograph faded with time, as he told the story to Cricket, as he counted to one hundred, night after night as he himself drifted next to his child, wondering how on earth such a tender thing could continue to survive.

The “p” word

This is not my daughter. I stole this image from http://www.visualphotos.com.

In walking through the thick murk of life “after” my daughter’s accident when she lost part of each finger on her left hand, I have been thinking and reading a lot about pity.  From the free online dictionary:

pit·y (pt)

1. Sympathy and sorrow aroused by the misfortune or suffering of another.

I appreciate real sympathy–it’s one of the things that has gotten us through this.  But I’ve seen pity on the faces of strangers, and it’s of a different shade than mere sympathy. Waiting in the surgeon’s office for a check-up, others sit silently and smile those lopsided smiles full of benevolence, and selfish relief. I imagine even beloved friends might feel it for us right now, along with gratitude that it didn’t happen to their kids. (I bet I’d feel the same way: sympathy, compassion, and glad it wasn’t us. This is human!) But very soon after realizing how the change in my daughter’s hand might change our lives, I had a visceral wave of wanting absolutely no pity. Not for her, not for me, not for us.

Today I was reminded of the rightness of my reaction.

For the first time since her accident, we went to the playground at the Antioch School where she will begin nursery school in September. The last time we were there, she had climbed, fearless as is her wont, to the top of the blue jungle gym. (I blogged about that moment here.) Today, she climbed up, not to the top, but just about. She slipped a couple of times, but wasn’t hurt, and was unfazed. As she climbed, I coached a bit more than I would like, and more than I did last time, reminding her to pay attention to her feet, and feel her body. (This is something I hope to instill in her throughout her life, wanting, for the eventual woman she will be: root-like grounding, and trusting of the gut, that intuition that flows without effort from our bodies, in which dwell our souls.) Today, she was so proud of what she could do. As I witnessed her work, I was aware of my own body quieting down, being exquisitely present, breathing through my own fear of her falling or getting hurt. (Her surgeon seems petrified at the thought of her re-injuring her hand. I am too. But dammit, I wanted her to climb!) When she reached her near-top destination, I praised her but showed no surprise. For, some little shard in me knew she could do this.

She asked about the monkey bars. This question of monkey bars has been clunking around in me since the accident. How will her hands grasp and support her weight when she’s sustaining her entire body? Will she ever be able to cross those bars? Today I told her that when she’s bigger, she will be able to hold herself up and cross them. She wanted to try. I held her up; she grabbed hold of a rung with both hands. I told her I could hold on or let go. She wanted me to let go. I was below her, ready to catch.

I let go.

She held on.

She didn’t fall.

She dropped gracefully after a moment of dangle, and I was there, surrounding her with my arms. “You did it!” I said.

Of course she did it. I knew she could, but seeing was another thing.

I believe this strong, amazing child (who the hell can display such bias, if not her mother?) needs no pity. She may need some other things.  She needs a world that allows for (and celebrates) all the ways we do what we do.  I know she will teach me plenty along the way.

I know how lucky I am that she’s here with me now.

The hands of a storyteller

From http://www.janetpihlblad.com/pages/leafwork_thumbpage.html

“The first sentence of every novel should be: ‘Trust me, this will take time but there is order here, very faint, very human.’  Meander if you want to get to town.”

This is from Michael Ondaatje’s book, In The Skin Of A Lion, which I blogged about here.  When I first read this passage, years ago, I realized this is the kind of fiction I want to write, and this proclamation provides comfort.

There’s a beautiful feeling I sometimes get when I’m reading.  It’s the moment I realize I’m in the hands of a good storyteller.  I’ve had that feeling sometimes reading “great” books, and sometimes reading unpublished student work.  The feeling helps me relax and be along for the journey, and I crave it in everything that I read.  This is not to say that I want what I read to soothe me–on the contrary.  (As the fabulous Joy Williams wrote in her essay “Uncanny the Singing That Comes From Certain Husks,” “Good writing never soothes or comforts.  It is no prescription, neither is it diversionary, although it can and should enchant while it explodes in the reader’s face.”)  But that somewhat unnamable awareness that I’m in good hands as I read is always welcome.  It has to do, maybe, with an amount of confidence (and sincerity) in the writer, because I don’t get that feeling, usually, when I read an overly clever or cynical voice–a narrative stance that, to me, usually feels insincere.  I think the feeling I’m pondering can be called “trust.”  As I notice it, something changes in my body; I relax a little (even if the story is unsettling, exploding in my face) because I understand an agreement the writer is making with me, and I am making with the writer: I trust that she or he will uphold whatever rules and aesthetics the story (or poem) requires, and I trust that the writer’s choices were made in earnest, and with honor behind them.

I want to give that same feeling to my readers.  With my words, I want to craft a net, a web, or a hammock, to catch, or lull them into a place, a moment, a thought.  Myself I want to quiet down to what’s essential, and I want the reader to witness (with me) that silver drop of water on a leaf, or that strange knocking sound that’s just too far off to identify but too close to ignore.

Escape

Hugh Laurie (before "House") and Stephen Fry

Near the end of the last century, I was traversing a difficult break-up.  It seemed the only thing that got me successfully out of my depths was watching “Law & Order” which aired incessantly (several times a day, but still not frequently enough) on the cable channel A&E.  Those gritty formulaic crimes and solutions, riding on the noble backs of wisecracks from well-worn characters like Lennie Briscoe, helped me survive my dark forest.  For an hour at a time, I was distracted enough to gain the relief called numbness–sometimes needed when real things are too hard to face.

Fast forward thirteen years or so, and I need another escape.  But we canceled cable last year, and now it wouldn’t be the classic L&O but instead one of its million children or grandchildren, the watered down spin-offs.  And I’m sure as beautiful as Mariska Hargitay may be, these pale descendents would not offer the comfort of long-ago Jerry Orbach.

So, to reading.  I’m enforcing a brief “vacation” from work-related reading.  First I picked up Animal Farm, which I  haven’t read since high school, and I love Orwell so want to read it again.  But quickly I surmised that wasn’t the right book.  Instead, on the beloved shelf I discovered a small gem called The Girl In Blue by P.G. Wodehouse.  A student had recommended it to me after a chat when we each admired Wodehouse (on whose birthday, incidentally, I was born).  I bought the book without knowing I wouldn’t have time to read it until now.  I’ve adored the Bertie Wooster stories since I read the first after watching their dramatizations with the unequaled (pre-”House”) Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry.  But I’d never ventured outside the sunny, funny confines of Wooster and Jeeves.

The Girl In Blue stands alone, that is, it’s the only book he wrote about these set of characters.  But Wodehouse’s hilarious hyperbole rings like a carillon throughout, and will sound to anyone who’s read his other books like the verbal equivalent of tucking into a good silk robe and a mohair chair before the fire, belly full of Anatole’s cooking.  The perfect escape.  A rollicking plot, and many hilarious twists, unfolding in a world blessedly unfamiliar to mine.  But it was impossible to ignore the habit of reading like a writer, and this is good because this time, I found the novel better than escape.  It’s Wodehouse’s prose.

In grandiose trappings, his sentences dance through and around what could easily turn to cliché, but he saves them just before they tumble; his facility with the shades and nuances of English spins what could be a simple fun romp into much finer stuff.  To hell with the high art/low art debate!  To hell with that lofty, sniffing disdain for stories created with the intention of (gasp!) entertainment.  (I’ve never really cared about that fight anyway, but it’s fun to officially cast it off here.)

Could I please just spend a year reading through all of Wodehouse?  Don’t they award grants for stuff like this?  For 2.3 seconds, wild-eyed and laughing, I consider applying for Ph.D. programs, dream of researching a dissertation on the women in Wodehouse, if only so I could immerse myself in the genius of this man’s words.

(Okay, just one more book…)

Now that I have stepped from the safety of Brinkley Court, I will follow Wodehouse anywhere.

I’ve been looking so long at my pictures of you that I almost believe that they’re real…

Life for my family has changed since my last post, in ways I will not count.  I want to be the woman who wrote that post, without wavering.  But now I have to fight the urge to protect my daughter like a china cup.

These are facts: On July 5, 2011, my daughter had an accident.  The four fingers on her left hand were detached part way down.  Her middle and ring fingers were too damaged to be re-attached, so are now shorter.  Her pointer and pinkie finger tips were able to be re-attached–we now wait and see if they “take.”  Her thumb was unharmed–excellent in terms of the ultimate function of her left hand.  She is out of bandages and her hand is healing, blue fringey stitches tickling my face as I read to her before bedtime about Piglet and Pooh and all the other sweet creatures in that fictional world.

There are facts, and there’s everything else.  Mostly the everything else is a rock-tumbler inside myself, shining up emotions, thoughts, and wonderings as they clunk around in my brain.  Luckily some of the stones in my head include amazement at the unexpected beauty and grace this accident has brought into our lives.  So many people are sending love and support and gifts and food and the list is endless.  We are lucky.

Merida’s courage and strength through this has been astonishing.  For truly: children are 100% brave and strong and if we step aside and give them space, and love, they know how to heal.  They lead us.  They help us heal.  We are lucky.

And then I think about how I haven’t been able to post here, how at first I couldn’t even write in my journal (for one thing, there was no time, but also, if I wrote it down it would mean it was real, that it really happened.)  And now I look up at the subtitle of my blog, which I change periodically, and find the most recent tag is a line from a Cure song that always haunts me.  From “Pictures of You” the line goes:

I’ve been looking so long at my pictures of you that I almost believe that they’re real…

There are photos of her hand before the accident that are impossible to linger with, impossible not to linger with.  There are photos since the accident, which at first I forced myself to take, beautiful photos, taken knowing that she (and we) will want a chronicle of her healing.  Knowing that this is now her hand, her beautiful hand, and we are so lucky.  Accepting that this is now how we are; this is how it is for us.  She can use her left hand well, better every day, despite the injury; she still considers herself left-handed, and because before the accident, she was very strongly left-handed, she is using it now without thinking, which will help healing, and function, and help her feel like herself.  Yesterday, for the first time, she played her grandmother’s violin, testing it out, to see how it feels, using both hands, making noise, bowing with her left hand.  We are so lucky.

Yet it’s so hard for me to look at any pictures of her hand prior to July 5, 2011.  All the bile I’ve absorbed my entire life about how a person (a girl, a woman, in particular) looks, all the propaganda and the noise joins the rocks in my head and clunks around in the mental tumbler, and I push them aside and try to stop caring about such unimportance, because I believe she will use her whole self: mind, spirit, voice, heart, body (including her left hand!) for greatnesses we cannot even anticipate.  But lookism seeps in, coats the rocks with rancid unshine, and I keep trying to rinse it off.  Must quickly come up with the antidote to hurtful things that other people will say to her, who knows when.  Must indoctrinate her well so she feels a clear, sweet resolve when she uses whatever comebacks or affirmations we can think of that amount to, “We all have damage, some visible, some not.  Nothing to see here–move along.”

When she was one month old, I wrote about filing the nails of her baby hand.  The post was entitled “Safety” and it was about keeping her from scratching her face with sharp baby nails.  I had no idea what her future would hold.  Still don’t!  And every fucking metaphor seems to involve hands, “what her future would hold,” the writer typed, thinking of hands, focussing on how her daughter still has two beautiful hands that work, and how the child is still alive and whole and strong and amazing.

We make the world.  We make it!  We color it, we frame it, we choose words and metaphors and say what we say to each other, and we love or dent or harm each other as we make the world, as we believe what we believe about each other.  I don’t want pity for her or for us.  I will make her world a fair and loving place.  She will know from our hearth that she is strong and amazing and beautiful and that she can do whatever she chooses to do; she will know that fact with every part of herself.

This story may be huge in her life for a while but it will not be her only story.

(Nous sommes embarques!)